A thunder strike bringing to changes with character used multiple times in films while it first was in novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley who was inspired by seeing how electricity causes a trembling of frog’s muscles.
A written text is masterful. One grammar mistake and one incoherent and contradictive metaphor in twenty-five read pages of one hundred one. I unfinished by baffled what created suspicion in emergence of confusing mistakes. A bankrupted merchant got money from other character, which supported his survival for ten months after that he died in woe. He had a big time in which he could find a job or open other business by having presumably sufficient finances. A main personage tells that he was one child in family until five and consider it as that he was long time alone what makes to assume that he was in conscience stance since he was born. Describing of character Elizabeth makes predictable her future what I checked and didn’t miss. There in reading seemed that I saw narration of a plot. I decided to read a summary of the book what rang a bell for eventual complete with novel.
The whole story is screenplay for soap opera. An author put in forward her story and left behind a commonsense. A monster made by Victor Frankenstein, whom everybody afraid, could make conversation with a blind man who could explain that Creature has no evil, no point causing fear for scientist that a woman-monster will worst his male being, Frankenstein doesn’t make reasonable stop of creature instead that passes a big time and he marries on Elizabeth what expectedly finishes her death by Creature who is contradictive in personality and the ending in which Frankenstein dies without strong medical reason and that happens only after telling his extreme long and detailed story from childhood till present – this solidifies that the author was inexperienced (well, Mary Shelley was twenty.). Personally, I would made severe cuts from texts, because a lot details don’t require many sentences. A conception on society which doesn’t accept that whose guise is different to them has people with preposterous prejudices in implementation. I recalled a precisely demonstration of that in The Invisible Man by Herbert George Wells appeared seventy-nine years later of Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. Writing of Wells wasn’t gold whereas he disclosed and demonstrated this aspect and this of memorable in his book.
